GaryMc
09-17-2002, 10:40 PM
Jake - here is the text of my recent e-mail to a local TV channel reporting on some guy who severed his hand at the wrist and had it re-attached. Good news, but possibly bad from the RIDGID standpoint. If it is true, then you guys can suck up. If not, you can see them in court.
Man who cut hand off - better call the lawyers
I am writing in response to your current news story about the man in Allentown who cut his hand off - fully - at the wrist, with a power saw. First thing, were I you, I would call the lawyers. Second, I would try to set the story straight, as this is an example of either good or irresponsible journalism.
On Monday night you reported that the hand was severed by use of a Circular Saw. This makes sense, as I and a whole slew of woodworkers (yes, your story has reached national attention through woodworking forums on the internet) consider the circular saw to be the most dangerous tool in the trade. However, on Tuesday night your reporter said the accident was due to a saw like THIS...then proceeded to show (what obviously was file footage) of a MITER SAW in operation, with the brand name RIDGID prominently displayed. Please note that RIDGID is the brand name of tools made by Emerson Electric Co., and sold exclusively through Home Depot, a fairly large commercial enterprise and probably a client either of NBC10 or NBC, or both.
Was the saw in question actually a RIDGID miter saw? If so, then you may be free and clear of any responsibility, even though I and the myriad national woodworkers find it hard to believe that any idiot, even one hyped up on drugs or booze, could possibly saw through his entire arm with one. If not, then I submit that you were irresponsible for reporting - and visibly displaying - a specific commercial product that had nothing to do with the accident. In such a case, if I were Emerson Electric or Home Depot, I would sue your pants off for irresponsible journalism and damage beyond comprehension.
If the situation is as I suspect, then I suggest you get the facts straight - never mind how important it may be to report "breaking news" or how easy it is to grab some "file footage."
I have been dismayed for some time by the shallowness of your "Health Watch" and "Consumer Alert" segments (basically restricted to headlines only - no useful information provided), even though I like the relative professionalism of your weather section. Please do not make me a sceptic regarding your basic news reporting - set this story straight, especially any lessons learned regarding safety practices, specific problematic tools, or deficiencies thereof.
Gary McKown
West Chester, PA
Man who cut hand off - better call the lawyers
I am writing in response to your current news story about the man in Allentown who cut his hand off - fully - at the wrist, with a power saw. First thing, were I you, I would call the lawyers. Second, I would try to set the story straight, as this is an example of either good or irresponsible journalism.
On Monday night you reported that the hand was severed by use of a Circular Saw. This makes sense, as I and a whole slew of woodworkers (yes, your story has reached national attention through woodworking forums on the internet) consider the circular saw to be the most dangerous tool in the trade. However, on Tuesday night your reporter said the accident was due to a saw like THIS...then proceeded to show (what obviously was file footage) of a MITER SAW in operation, with the brand name RIDGID prominently displayed. Please note that RIDGID is the brand name of tools made by Emerson Electric Co., and sold exclusively through Home Depot, a fairly large commercial enterprise and probably a client either of NBC10 or NBC, or both.
Was the saw in question actually a RIDGID miter saw? If so, then you may be free and clear of any responsibility, even though I and the myriad national woodworkers find it hard to believe that any idiot, even one hyped up on drugs or booze, could possibly saw through his entire arm with one. If not, then I submit that you were irresponsible for reporting - and visibly displaying - a specific commercial product that had nothing to do with the accident. In such a case, if I were Emerson Electric or Home Depot, I would sue your pants off for irresponsible journalism and damage beyond comprehension.
If the situation is as I suspect, then I suggest you get the facts straight - never mind how important it may be to report "breaking news" or how easy it is to grab some "file footage."
I have been dismayed for some time by the shallowness of your "Health Watch" and "Consumer Alert" segments (basically restricted to headlines only - no useful information provided), even though I like the relative professionalism of your weather section. Please do not make me a sceptic regarding your basic news reporting - set this story straight, especially any lessons learned regarding safety practices, specific problematic tools, or deficiencies thereof.
Gary McKown
West Chester, PA